> var ref = (''+document.referrer+''); document.write('" />
When I was growing up in Brooklyn I remember seeing a black man on Pacific street wearing an orange suit and everybody stopped. I never forgot that. He looked like a god. This was in the ’50s. That was a transcendent moment for me. He seemed to be moving in slow motion and it just blew my mind. Clothes and jewelry have always been very important to me in observance of how people present themselves because that’s empowerment. Everything I do is about self-presentation and empowerment. You know why it’s so important? Because even people who have very little can control how they present themselves to the world. If you have no money, no nothing, you can throw on a scarf, put your hat to the side and walk out in to the street and feel good. It’s style. Diana Vreeland said if you’re not born with it I feel sorry for your ass. Coreen Simpson (via feelknower1993)

(via feelknower1993)

mariowiki:

*X-FILES THEME PLAYS*
The truth is out there

mariowiki:

*X-FILES THEME PLAYS*

The truth is out there

(via bubblegloopswamp)

violentdeke:

I just laughed for what felt like 10 minutes

violentdeke:

I just laughed for what felt like 10 minutes

(via marrionettekind)


{ x }
{ x }

(via mymullet)

(via ferroseed)

just now remembering one of the worse parts from when homestuck was popular was all the people who didn’t like homestuck trying to convince the people who did that it was terrible

like fuck off 

tuxedomamoru:

this is necessary for my survival

(via hungry-bao)

parents-vs-esports:

MY FAVORITE DRINK

parents-vs-esports:

MY FAVORITE DRINK

(via christinadisco)

A Proposed General Rule about Pictures of Naked People

fishingboatproceeds:

fishingboatproceeds:

I mean, I’m not saying that we can enforce this as law or anything. I also might be wrong about this. But:

Just as a general rule, I feel like we should not look at pictures of the breasts or genitalia of people who would rather we not look at pictures of their breasts or genitalia.

As a corollary to that general rule, I would add that I don’t see anything wrong with looking at pictures of breasts or genitalia of people who have invited us to do so. There seem to be plenty such pictures for us to get a reasonably good grasp of, like, the diversity of unclothed human anatomy without having to look at people who wish we wouldn’t.

This seems pretty straightforward to me. Yes, the photographer(s) who photographed Kate Middleton’s grainy distant breasts were violating her privacy. But so do people who choose to look at those pictures.

So maybe we can just agree not to? And this goes not only for princesses, I would argue, but also for people who send things to their romantic partners, who turn out to be jerks and release those photos publicly. Or people whose phones are hacked. etc.

In this world where most every curiosity can be satiated, it seems to me genuinely heroic to resist the urge to look at everything that can be seen, and instead to respect the wishes of those who feel violated or hurt by the availability of images they wish were private.

Seemed a good day to reblog this.

(via christinadisco)

A family that showers together stays together.

A family that showers together stays together.